![]() Beloit College Magazine
| ![]()
- By James Goodale When a student of mine, Sarah Ruja’02, informed me last fall that she was conducting research on original sheets from a late-medieval chronicle, I immediately dropped everything and raced across campus to see the material for myself. There, in the basement of the Wright Museum of Art, I found Sarah working with some of the most beautiful pages I had ever seen in person. Instantly, I recalled the moment in my life when I knew I had to be an historian. It was the winter of 1984, and I was a college senior worrying about what I would be doing in five short months. During a mid-term break, a friend and I flew to Mexico City for a change of scenery which we hoped would do us good. One day, while walking around the city, I stumbled upon the compound where Leon Trotsky had spent his final years. I vaguely remembered Trotsky’s name from a Soviet history course I had taken years earlier, so I ventured in.
There is a certain joy to working with primary sources, a joy that we in the history department strive to introduce and foster among our students. As a scholar who works on European material of the 15th- and 16th-centuries, I am often frustrated that I am limited to offering my students photographs or photocopies of primary texts. So with great cheer, I observed Sarah scrutinizing sheets from the Nuremberg Chronicle. As we discussed the document, I was thrilled to hear that she was feeling the same sort of exhilaration I had experienced 16 years earlier. Historical Record-Keeping
How a society practices history is culturally determined, and one
can learn a great deal about the concerns, fears, and desires of a particular society by
focusing on how and why it chose to record history—both in terms of the subject matter
selected and the form chosen for historical writing. So, what is a “chronicle”? In Europe’s
late Middle Ages, the chronicle was the standard form of historical representation.
Chronicles were works that focused on broad subjects within a specific geographical area,
and inside a social arena.
Scholars today consider chronicles as an inferior form of written history. Contemporary historians try to fashion—through an imaginative process—a narrative structure that links recorded events in a coherent manner. In doing so, they attempt to create a discourse in which facts, analyses, and conclusions are synthesized, debated, and resolved in a way that the text reads like a good story. In contrast, the authors of chronicles were not much concerned with narrative-based representations of history; while they respected the chronological order of events, their works ultimately lack coherent meaning. Chronicles have neither “plot” nor “resolution,” and no moral lesson to be learned, either. “Key” events, dating either from the Creation or from the Incarnation, are recorded in a deliberately subjective style, and the work of history ends or (more accurately) simply stops at the point in time when the chronicler takes pen in hand.
A Valuable Teaching Tool The complete Nuremberg Chronicle (also known as Weltchronik or Liber Chronicarum) outlines the rise and fall of noble families from Bavaria (specifically the city of Nuremberg) and details conflicts that played out. Published in 1493, the chronicle was one of the first popular books that featured secular stories. The five unbound pages owned by the Wright Museum of Art include Latin script and wonderfully detailed woodcut print illustrations. Although not colored, the individual pages are visually arresting. Even though the Nuremberg Chronicle itself is not a reliable record of past events, Beloit’s pages are unique and valuable artifacts.
This term, students in my “Popular Culture in Early-Modern Europe” and “European Reformations” classes will view the words and illustrations from the late-15th-century Nuremberg Chronicle. Analyzing the text and viewing the images on these documents will provide an excellent supplement to their regular readings and assignments, helping the students better understand the radical difference between our conceptions of social reality and those held by late-medieval and early-modern Europeans. And I hope a few of tomorrow’s students will feel the same exhilaration that Sarah, I, and the chroniclers themselves felt as we considered our own primary sources.
Nicollette Meister - Collections Manager, College Museums
|
||
| Back to top... |